Invented specifications
A model fills gaps. A wrong hardness rating or a maintenance instruction that does not hold ends up under your name, not the tool's.
Article engine
An article on your site that claims nothing beyond your own documentation. You read it in your portal, you approve it, and only then does it go live.
01 – Why not just AI
A model fills gaps. A wrong hardness rating or a maintenance instruction that does not hold ends up under your name, not the tool's.
Your suppliers' documentation is protected by copyright. Lifting it word for word is the risk that gets underestimated most often.
Publishing a lot without adding value falls under the scaled content abuse policy. That hits your whole domain, not one page.
02 – How it works
Product sheets, maintenance instructions, warranty terms, the explanations you now email one by one. Anything outside that does not count.
A piece with a claim that has no source never arrives. It is refused at the door, so it does not reach you and it does not reach your site.
Behind each claim sits the paragraph it rests on, and which document it came from. Click it and you read that paragraph, with the address attached.
You read, edit, or send it back with a reason. Who decided what and when is recorded. Without that click, nothing happens.
03 – What does not get through
The gate is arithmetic, not a second AI judging the first one's work. If a piece fails, it never even reaches you.
Every reference has to point at a paragraph that genuinely sits in your documentation.
A paragraph with a number in it and no reference below does not get in. That is exactly where a text generator goes wrong.
An article that points nowhere is a guess, however well it reads.
You. Which is also your cover under the EU AI Act, article 50.
A treated worktop keeps stains out for as long as the sealant holds.Reference 1, pointing at the source below.
Worktop maintenance sheet, paragraph 3
The sealant forms a shield against stains from oil, grease, wine and coffee. Reapply it as soon as water stops beading on the surface.
This is what your portal shows: click the number and you read the paragraph from your own document. The example itself is made up; in your articles it is your documentation sitting underneath.
04 – Your portal
You log in with your own email address. It shows what is waiting for you, what it rests on, and where the project stands. Twenty minutes per piece, no more than that.
05 – Where it lands
The moment you approve, the piece goes to your own site. Which route that takes we settle in the first week, and it changes nothing about the price.
06 – What we need from you
The thicker the pack, the better the articles. We test this in week one, not in month four.
The questions customers ask daily live in their heads and nowhere else.
Someone who can judge the content and press approve. That is your legal protection too.
07 – Law and liability
08 – Questions
A fixed price for your situation, and you hear it after one conversation. What sets it is how much material you have and how often you want to publish. No hourly billing, and you are not tied to anything afterwards.
Because a piece with a claim that has no source behind it does not get in. That is a check at the door, not a promise: every reference has to point at a paragraph that really exists in your own documentation, and a paragraph with a number in it and no reference is refused. Behind every claim it says which document it came from, and you can read that paragraph yourself.
Then we say so, at the end of the first week. We start with a source check and not with writing, because without material it becomes a text generator and that is not what we sell. It is often better than people think: product sheets, maintenance instructions and the explanations your sales desk emails out every day already add up to a set.
AI Act article 50 has applied since 2 August 2026. Editorial review by a person removes that labelling duty, and that review is exactly what you do in the portal: you read, you approve, and who decided what and when is recorded. That log is your cover.
Yes. WordPress through an application password, a static site through your own repo, or your own system through an endpoint with a secret in the header. If your platform cannot accept anything, we put the blog next to it on your own domain, in a subfolder and never on a subdomain. We decide the route in the first week, and it does not change the price.
About twenty minutes per piece: reading, and then approving, editing or sending it back with a reason. Plus one hour-long conversation with your sales desk at the start, because the questions customers ask every day live in their heads and nowhere else.
You do. We claim no copyright on AI output; in the EU it probably does not exist, and we would rather say that plainly than bury it in small print. You do warrant that you are allowed to use the documentation you supply.
By the end of the first week we both know whether there is enough material. If there is not, we will say so.
Book a call